On 20030416T094049-0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote: > * Why you shouldn't use the GFDL:: Debian doesn't recommend using this > license. > > And what if this new section listing reasons _not_ to use this license > were made... invariant!
If we were to add to each GFDL'd document a section (invariant or not) saying, essentially, that we consider GFDL a non-free license (what else can that section say?), we would have to start moving such documents to nonfree at the same time. Otherwise we'd be hypocrites. Personally I believe that simply moving them to nonfree is far more effective than such an added section. Look at the publicity our stance against KDE used to generate when it had its license problem. -- %%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%% Taiteellisen ohjelmoinnin ystävien seura Toys - Ohjelmointi on myös taidetta http://www.cc.jyu.fi/yhd/toys/
pgpCgRIpUXBQM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
