Scripsit Mark Rafn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Mark Rafn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I'm close on this one. "does not identify itself as unmodified in any > > > way" is harder for me to understand than "identifies itself as modified". > > It is just a little less restrictive. Instead of requiring people to > > make a positive action to show that something is modified, they only > > have to prevent it from showing that it isn't. > Hmm. I'm not sure it's actually less restrictive. Preventing another > piece of software (the base format) from making a claim is a lot harder > than making a positive claim yourself. But it never said "the modified file must prevent other software from claiming blah". It said "the modified file must not itself claim blah". -- Henning Makholm "We will discuss your youth another time."
