On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 02:06 am, Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
> the author clarified his license with regard to the Python version.
> The version in question now is the PSF 2.1 license[1], which is
> incompatible with GPL[2]. However, I think it's DFSG free and therefore
> can be packaged. Any objections?
>
> [1] http://www.python.org/2.1/license.html
> [2] http://www.python.org/2.1/fsf.html
That second page actually finishes up indicating that the license in question
is modified to be GPL compatible. Indeed, the clause in question (7) appears
to be compatible in the 2.1 version.
Richard
