Scripsit Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > (please keep me in Cc: as I'm not in the list)
> Livermore Public License (LPL), an Open Source License" which is QPL-based. > It seems free to me, but I would like to gather some consensus before > putting any work into it. So, is > http://www.opensourcefirewall.com/lpl_license.html DFSG-free? If it's true that it's just QPL with the name and legal venue changed (and I didn't find any glaring differences on a quick readthrough), it is probably free. HOWEVER, I find it worrying that the legal venue is stated as | This license is governed by the Laws of the State of Texas and any | disputes shall be decided by mediation. Does this mean that the user has to submit to some unspecified "mediation" and waive his right to have a real court interpret the license in case of trouble? If so, it doesn't seem free. -- Henning Makholm "Så drikker jeg det hele. Det har en festlig smag."
