On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 00:11, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > David Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 16:00, Walter Landry wrote: > > > Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> wrote: > > > > Arguments about practicality, that this makes doing legitimate things > > > > harder > > > > or impossible in some situations for purely technical reasons (the > > > > stranded > > > > on an island test does this), are valid, but I haven't really seen any. > > > > > > What about an ATM machine? If the ATM machine communicated with the > > > central database using code with this enforced distribution clause, > > > then you have to distribute to the users of the ATM. Modifying an ATM > > > to distribute code in addition to cash seems rather onerous. > > > > Print a link on the reciepts. > > The license doesn't say that is sufficient, does it?
I don't know. Maybe. But certainly, a better-written version might, hence why I keep asking for comments. -- -Dave Turner Stalk Me: 617 441 0668 "On matters of style, swim with the current, on matters of principle, stand like a rock." -Thomas Jefferson
