[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luis Bustamante) writes: > Hi, > > I packaged JpGraph[1], it is an object oriented class library for > php4. Currently, it is dual licensed under QPL 1.0 and JpGraph > Commercial License[2]. It doesn't have any restriction for open-source > use (you can even use QPL for commercial opensource use). The > commercial license is used for commercial non-opensource. I brought > this issue a couple of weeks ago to d-legal because it wasn't clear if > QPL could be used in commercial open-source projects, but now the > author explains better jpgraph license in his website. > > QPL is DFSG-free iirc, can JpGraph go in main despite the fact it can > be used also under the terms of JpGraph Commercial License?
Eh, for reference, this is the copyright that was in the package I rejected: | Copyright: | | JpGraph is released under a dual license. QPL 1.0 (Qt Free Licensee) | for non-commercial, open-source and educational use and JpGraph | Professional License for commercial non-opensource use. | | Basically it means that if you or your company develops non open | source software and have financial gains, either directly or | indirectly (for example by improving a business process), by using | JpGraph this counts as commercial use. | | The Professional JpGraph License 1.2 can be found at | http://www.aditus.nu/jpgraph/jpgprolicense.pdf -- James
