Sam Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > You can always introduce a GR.
This is fucking ridiculous; I've already explained twice what Ardo needs to do to get his packages past us and that's simply to comply with policy. I've already explained twice that the problems with the equivocal (at best) 'same terms as perl' ``license'' are not keeping his packages out of the archive. Why the hell is anyone talking about GRs and/or veto powers? *BLAH* -- James
