>>>>> "John" == John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 05:08:15PM -0500, Russell Nelson
>> Take out the R&D and personal use grants. Does it still comply
>> with the DFSG? Now add them back. How is it possible for more
>> freedom to make the software DFSG-nonfree?
John> Because the freedom is distributed unevenly. DFSG states
John> that there must not be discrimination. If there is -- that
John> is, if different people/groups get different levels of
John> freedom -- then it is not DFSG-free.
For the record I would like to state that I cannot be part of a
consensus for this interpretation of the DFSG. I do not wish to
discuss this point now but would be happy to discuss this point at
any future time when a specific package comes before this list.
I'm also happy to discuss now off-list; it just seems pointless to
waste list traffic on a side discussion when the purpose of the list
is for license review.
