Brian M. Carlson writes: > Any software under this license[0] is non-free but is OSI Certified Open > Source Software. I don't particularly remember why; you can search the > archives, but the consensus was that it was non-free.
Hmmm... license-discuss vetted it against the OSD, but debian-legal turned it down under the DFSG even though the language for both is nearly identical. What annoys me about this process is that we *specifically* established license-discuss to keep this from happening. Perhaps I should be sending proposed licenses to debian-legal as well as license-discuss? -- -russ nelson http://russnelson.com | You get prosperity when Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | the government does less, 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | not when the government Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | does something right.
