Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In my opinion, the DFSG should not be interpreted in a way that > legitimizes any restrictions on use, and this is what the FSF's "freedom > zero" and DFSG 6 is about.
The FSF freedom zero, yes, but I don't see that in DFSG 6. I see nothing in the DFSG which prevents the APSL and that's what's prompted this thread (even though I messed up and started talking about EULA-stuff, because I kinda suspect that's in the APSL somewhere - it's very unclear).
