Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > And if they put users through a click-wrap license, but don't require it > on redistribution, there seems to be no point.
I have trouble figuring out clause 2 in the APSL, specifically point 2.2.c. > (I've seen some slightly confused Windows installers for GPL > programs with a click-through containing the GPL. No real harm in > that, I think, but it's unnecessary.) I personally think that that harms (if ever so slightly) the image of the GLP as being "more free than copyright".
