Terry Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tuesday 26 November 2002 01:59 pm, Rich Walker wrote: > > We've been putting together some robot-related software and hardware. We > > want to release this with a DFSG-compliant license set. For the > > software, GPL, no problems. For the hardware we propose to include .pcb > > files for pcb, .sch files for gschem, and .asm files for the PIC > > firmware. What licenses are appropriate for hardware releases? > > The LART license is probably required reading on this subject ;-) > > http://www.lart.tudelft.nl/LICENSE
Yes; I'm currently looking at that and the OpenIPCore license. http://www.opencores.org/OIPC/OHGPL.shtml. Are these both compliant licenses? > and you'll probably want to look at the site in general > > http://www.lart.tudelft.nl/ > > for other information about an apparently successful open > hardware project. cheers for that, Rich Walker. -- rich walker | technical person | Shadow Robot Company | [EMAIL PROTECTED] front-of-tshirt space to let 251 Liverpool Road | London N1 1LX | +UK 20 7700 2487
