> the road. The best way to accomplish such a goal is to start off using
> the GPL, assign copyright to the FSF (and sign the paperwork), and
> accept patches only when the contributor is also willing to sign the
> paperwork. It's tedious, but changing licenses later in the game is
> difficult when multiple contributors are involved.
Agreed that changing licenses is tedious. I think that Larry Hunter's
idea is the best that can be done for changing the existing license
and is also adequate for a license change.
As far as I've heard from ILISP developers over time, everyone would
welcome a license change. So, hopefully this will be the start of the
end of a history of license change discussions.
--
Kevin Rosenberg | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
http://b9.com/debian.html | : :' : The universal
GPG signed and encrypted | `. `' Operating System
messages accepted. | `- http://www.debian.org/
