Scripsit Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 2) I assert that NetBSD's libc, while under a 4-clause license, qualifies > under the GPL clause exempting system libraries from the linking > limitations (that nailed OpenSSL and others).
Which part of "unless that component itself accompanies the executable" don't you understand? > > What is the fourth clause of the license you're referring to? > http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/bsd.html has an example of the clause in > question. The clause quoted there has the number 3 attached to it. Again: What is the fourth clause of the license you're referring to? Or is there a zeroth clause? -- Henning Makholm "Det er du nok fandens ene om at mene. For det ligger i Australien!"
