In chiark.mail.debian.legal, you wrote: >The current generation of BSD system libraries are all licensed in a >GPL-compatible manner (BSD license w/o advertising clause). So this is >not a problem unless they try to link gcc against something that has not=20 >had the licensing clause removed, such as OpenSSL. :)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/lib/libc/stdio$ uname NetBSD [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/lib/libc/stdio$ cat _fseeko.c /* $NetBSD: _fseeko.c,v 1.1 2000/07/08 13:46:35 kleink Exp $ */ /* * Copyright (c) 1996 Christos Zoulas. All rights reserved. * <snip> * 3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this software * must display the following acknowledgement: * This product includes software developed by Christos Zoulas. <snip> Large swathes of NetBSD are still 4 clause BSD and aren't copyright UCB. This includes chunks of the C library. So, no. The current generation of BSD system libraries is very much not GPL compatible. -- Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
