On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 11:56:57PM +0200, Martin Schr?der wrote: > On 2002-10-07 12:47:51 -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote: > > Ali Akcaagac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > it's your definition isn't it ? > > > > No. Read www.opensource.org's definition at point 3: > > Which is the definition of a body calling itself "Open Source > Initiative".
The one that holds the trademark on "Open Source". Surely you must agree that that gives their definition special status? > Interestingly the LPPL currently is not OSI certified. Does it > follow that LaTeX is closed source? -> debian-legal archives ad nauseam Cheers, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
