Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It has been argued (during the LaTeX license debate) that "the license > may require derived works to carry a different name" refers to the > software or package name, and not a functional item such as a source > code filename (which makes modification much more difficult).
Not quite right. If only a source code filename were implicated, that would not be a problem. It's restrictions on what gets *installed* that is the problem.
