It hasn't substantially changed since Aladdin's PS reader was put into non-free (gs-aladdin).
On Tue, 23 Jul 2002, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote: >Hi, > >I'm ITP'ing PDFlib which has an "Aladdin Free Public License". The >full text is available from > > http://www.pdflib.com/pdflib/aladdin-license.pdf > >which in short and non-legal terms comes down to > > - you may develop free software with PDFlib, provided you make all of your > own source code publicly available > - you may develop software for your own use with PDFlib as long as you don't > sell it > - you may redistribute PDFlib non-commercially > - you may redistribute PDFlib on digital media for a fee if the complete > contents of the media are freely redistributable. > >I'm not so sure about the last two items. They smell like non-free to me. > >I also intend to package the Perl module PDFlib (Debian poackage will be >called 'libpdflib-perl') which has the same license as Perl itself. This >one has to go in contrib if PDFlib goes in non-free. > >The module Apache::AxKit::Language::AxPoint of the AxKit package and Perl >module XML::Handler::AxPoint are dependent on that Perl module. Am I right >in thinking these latter two also have to go in contrib then? > >Thanks, >Ardo > -- void hamlet() {#define question=((bb)||(!bb))} Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED] that's who! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
