> Um, no. The real objection is: it's not DFSG free. Last time I asked for an objective list of places where people thought LPPL didn't meet the DFSG, someone posted such a list and Frank I think addressed all the raised points in his last draft, didn't he?
> The other comments are attempts to convince you to switch, by pointing > out that the requirement doesn't actually achieve your goals, and that > there is a better way to achieve them. But the only alternative I've seen offered is registering the name "latex" which might help for latex itself but isn't really a viable alternative for all the other LPPL'd packages, many of which are small (some very small) contributions that people have given in their spare time, it's not reasonable to ask people to register those names. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
