On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 02:56:25PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote: > This "preferred form" rule has always bothered me somewhat for these > reasons, particularly in the context of existing Debian packages > containing docs distributed in a format other than the original. And maybe > it's not reasonable for me to hope that the legalese can be made precise > enough to address this, but there you have it.
Perhaps you specify that any systems required to edit using the preferred form must also be (made) available under a "compliant" license (i.e. one which satisfies the DFSG)... -- Nick Phillips -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Don't you wish you had more energy... or less ambition? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
