On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 07:13:07PM -0400, Simon Law wrote: > Reading through the license exception again, we only need to > worry if the OpenSSL folks get nasty on us. This is because modified > versions of OpenSSL must use the same license as OpenSSL (four-clause BSD > with OpenSSL advertising.) So, to protect us from nasty OpenSSL folks, > might we need to put in a condition that it be free software? [...] > THE DEBIAN FREE SOFTWARE GUIDELINES (DFSG)
The DFSG is a nice document, but unfortunately I do not believe it is up to the task of being scrutinized under contract law. I like Jeff's idea better. -- G. Branden Robinson | Debian GNU/Linux | If existence exists, [EMAIL PROTECTED] | why create a creator? http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
pgprPICVBCc2c.pgp
Description: PGP signature
