On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 07:41:55PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Sorry, this isn't precisely accurate on the OpenBSD folks part. The GPL > > allows you to use this exception "unless [the library] accompanies the > > executable" which it would if the executable were allowed into main. It's > > the exact same situation we had with KDE/Qt. > With this reasoning, the only other way it's legal to distribute > GPL binaries linked against glibc and other LGPLed libraries (which > are also distributed in main)
No, the LGPL (and other compatible libraries) are "GPL compatible", which means that doing everything the GPL requires (and nothing more) also happens to satisfy the licenses they have, and aren't a problem at all because of this. OpenSSL isn't GPL compatible, though, so it is. The "distributed as a core part of the operating system" exception is only needed for libraries that aren't GPL compatible, like Solaris' or Windows' libc. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``Debian: giving you the power to shoot yourself in each toe individually.'' -- with kudos to Greg Lehey
pgp5dWcxZpyJ5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
