On Sunday 3 March 2002 15:28, Christian Hammers wrote: > Hello > > I understand that the latest RFCs have a license that might probably > be intended to, but clearly be interpreted as _not_ to comply with the > DFSG. (See > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=92810&repeatmerged=yes) > > If this interpretation is general consensus between the wise men of > debian-legal then maybe the DPL should mail ISC if they change their > license or at least clarify it, as proposed in the bug report. > > Anyway, as I don't like to see this package dropped from woody I propose > that the maintainer, or I (as NMU) simple re-uploads the package into > non-free. I know that then it's officially not "in Debian", too, but at > least most distributers and FTP mirrors will carry it.
Would indeed be strange that specifications of many protocols/etc used by many Debian packages itself would not be part of Debian+extras. Egon
