On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 09:39:12AM -0500, Peter S Galbraith wrote: > The show stopper is > > - commercial products that include this document are themselves > compliant with the DSFG and don't consist of this document only. > > for DSFG #9 (License Must Not Contaminate Other Software).
Yes, that is my opinion too. A proper DFDG would be nicer though, but i have not the time to go into this right now ... Friendly, Sven Luther