Glenn Maynard wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 10:54:30AM +0100, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> > > > e) When the GNU General Public License applies to the changes,
> > > > you can
> > > > distribute the modified Vim under the GNU General Public
> > > > License.
> > >
> > > What if I have a copy with no changes at all, and want to distribute it
> > > linked against GPM? I have to make a change (so it's a "modified Vim")?
> >
> > As far as Vim is concerned, an unmodified Vim can be distributed without
> > restrictions. You can compile an executable and include it. That's the
> > very first paragraph of the Vim license. It doesn't matter what license
> > applies to libraries.
> >
> > So, if linking with a GPL library isn't a change, the first paragraph
> > applies and the Vim license doesn't restrict distribution. This is GPL
> > compatible, the GPL license of the library overrules this, thus the GPL
> > applies.
>
> But if there were no changes, e) isn't an option, so we're not allowed
> to change it to the GPL, so GPM's license restricts it.
That's not a problem, because without changes the first paragraph
applies, and it's compatible with the GPL (no restrictions on the
distribution).
> Maybe someone else could explain how this would be permitted, but it
> would seem simple to make e) not care if there were changes or not.
I don't think it needs to be changed. However, someone from the FSF
should confirm that.
> > If linking with a GPL library is a change, then the new e) applies and
> > distribution under the GPL can be done as well.
>
> That would mean that simply compiling a program is changing it.
Yeah, I wouldn't call linking a change.
--
A special cleaning ordinance bans housewives from hiding dirt and dust under a
rug in a dwelling.
[real standing law in Pennsylvania, United States of America]
/// Bram Moolenaar -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.moolenaar.net \\\
((( Creator of Vim -- http://vim.sf.net -- ftp://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim )))
\\\ Help me helping AIDS orphans in Uganda - http://iccf-holland.org ///
