Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes: > Now, I don't see any problems with the doc-debian approach I suggested, > but perhaps you do: it's hard to tell since you just completely ignored > it and made your own suggestion.
Well, the doc-debian approach: 1) Would still have invariant text in the main archive (since there would now be a GNU Manifesto in doc-debian), and thus wouldn't satisfy the people on one end of the spectrum; and 2) Doesn't actually conform to the license on the Emacs and GCC manuals, or other GFDL manuals that might in the future contain invariant sections.
