On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 05:36:29PM -0800, Mark Rafn wrote: > 2) Documents with some amount of invariant non-license text can still > be considered free.
> 4) Generally, we shouldn't include documents with invariant text because > they're not free, but we should make occasional exceptions. Something like this. Or even that generally it's okay, but we can make occasional exceptions to *not* include such a work. This is where the irreplacable human judgement comes in. We just don't know what crappy ideas people will come up with to write bullet-proofs policies for that. I have no technical worries about invariant non-technical sections. As to the political/moral worries about it, we can just deal with it as it happens as we deal with software that has similar problems (anarchy package, fortunes offensive etc). Thanks, Marcus -- `Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' Debian http://www.debian.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] Marcus Brinkmann GNU http://www.gnu.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.marcus-brinkmann.de