> On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 10:54:18AM -0500, Peter S Galbraith wrote: > > But I think including the URL in the package description would satisfy > > the license. > > Are we to permit licensors to dictate to us the precise contents of our > package descriptions? Should this be regarded as compatible with the > DFSG? > > -- > G. Branden Robinson
Those are different questions. I already said I didn't know whether this condition made it non-free or not. But in my opinion, distribution of that package (and sources) such as we do from http://packages.debian.org does not qualify us for the exemption from that clause. Peter
