On Fri, Oct 12, 2001 at 12:55:14PM -0700, Walter Landry wrote: > Why don't you ask him why he won't allow the alphanumerics to be > altered? If it is just that he doesn't want people to make them ugly, > and thus reflect badly on him, them he can put in a clause where > derived works must be given a different name. Unfortunately, It > sounds a little like he wants people to get improved fonts from him, > for a fee. There may not be a way to free these fonts. > > Other than the modifcations part, I don't see any problem with the > fonts going into main. They can certainly go into non-free as is.
There's also a clause about not changing the name. Since we have a clause specifically permitting forcing a name change, I'd say that not permitting a name change would be disallowed restricting modification. -- David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pointless website: http://dvdeug.dhis.org "I saw a daemon stare into my face, and an angel touch my breast; each one softly calls my name . . . the daemon scares me less." - "Disciple", Stuart Davis
