Neil Conway wrote: > Basically, the author is objecting to the Debian policy of referring to > the system-wide copy of the GPL; he is arguing that a copy of the GPL > should be included with his package, which is GPL'd. He makes some > pretty good points, but Debian policy disagrees with him.
RMS has argued the same thing. You can refer back to that discussion though he seems to have let it drop (?) -- see shy jo
