Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > In principle, at least, we should be able to find a basis for agreement, > > > and go from there. > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 09:20:29PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > > Where to? What exactly is served by the whole discussion? > > If, as he claims, there's merit to the advertising clause, then we need > to change our practices. I'd like to at least resolve that.
It's agreed on all sides that the advertising clause *is* enforceable in the UK and in general outside the US. So we should comply regardless. It's not clear that it applies. It doesn't say that you must always mention Foo in your ads if you are distributing the software; it says you must mention Foo when you otherwise advertise the features of Foo. We don't usually mention specific features of anything at all.
