On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 04:29:35PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote: > > The real problem is that it is a pain for the user to use a toplevel > interpreter without propper input history support. The authors couldn't care > less, and don't want (yet) to release the few files from the toplevel > interpreter uinder the gpl. But this again may change later, especially if > they loose some of the ideological fears they may have on the GPL. >
Why not use libeditline instead? It's source-code compatible with the basic features of readline and has a BSD (sans ad clause) type license. -- Brian Ristuccia [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
