On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 09:13:49PM +0100, Oliver Elphick wrote: > I have to reiterate a query about what to do with postgresql in view of its > now being linked with libssl. > > Since this question is currently being referred to legal advice, do you > want me to move postgresql into non-us, which will force any packages > depending on it into non-us too, or should I leave it alone pending > resolution of the legal question? > > (I do not propose to do anything to remove the ssl code from PostgreSQL.) >
Do not neglect security in order to avoid non-us. If current policy dictates that PostgreSQL as it currently stands needs to go in non-us, then that's where you should put it. Policy that requires packages depending on packages in non-us also be in non-us will not change even if the current legal inquiry finds that not all crypto containing uploads need to go to non-us. -- Brian Ristuccia [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
