Sam Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I have to agree with you and disagree with Thomas.  If the code is
> simply bits that will be spewed out to some device, that seems much
> more like a combination than linking.

I'm sorry; I think I insufficiently understood the case, but now I've
got it better.

Ok, I think it probably does not conflict with the GPL for the driver
to include a string of bytes which are fed down to the hardware as an
independent program, using the driver as just a program loader.

As you point out, however, this is not DFSG free under any stretch of
the imagination if we don't have and distribute the source to these
bits. 

Reply via email to