On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 01:27:46PM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote: > On Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 06:25:34PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote: > > That is not my problem. The package was rejected because of: > > > > |This package isn't under just the GPL as the copyright file says, but > > |the GPL plus some very important exceptions. > > | > > |-- > > |James > > > [...] > > > > I wish a statement from James why the extra permissions make the package > > unsuitable for Debian main. > > The way I read it, the rejection was just because the copyright > file did not contain the full license.
I think the statement was unclear, but that would be a serious, if
easily fixable, problem.
sam th --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- http://www.abisource.com/~sam/
OpenPGP Key: CABD33FC --- http://samth.dyndns.org/key
DeCSS: http://samth.dynds.org/decss
pgp7WihJm9pD8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
