Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 10:21:45PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote: >> You may distribute sources of derivative works of the work >> provided that (1) (a) all source files of the original work that >> have been modified, (b) all source files of the derivative work >> that contain any party of the original work, and (c) all source >> files of the derivative work that are necessary to compile, link >> and run the derivative work without unresolved external calls and >> with the same functionality of the original work (``Necessary >> Sources'') carry a prominent notice explaining the nature and date >> of the modification and/or creation. You are encouraged to make >> the Necessary Sources available under this license in order to >> further the development and acceptance of the work. > >Does this really say that if you change anything in the source, you >have to put a "prominent notice" about it in ALL source files? >(According to (c), even in your own source files.)
Bah. It does indeed appear to. (And then doesn't require you to make the source available - amusingly pointless.) It's not as if the Wine people are going to sue or anything, but I think it would be best to just port to the sanely-licensed header files and be done with it. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
