So, the question comes back to: non-free or not distributable at all? I think the case of KDE sets the precedent, and it's not distributable at all.
Aside: Would "doing the impossible" be a "field of endeavor"? :) On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, Barak Pearlmutter wrote: > > These are linux-specific kernel modules, I doubt that they're going to be > > usable in debian/hurd or debian/bsd... > > Perhaps not, but "you are free to use, modify, and redistribute this > code in any place where it makes sense to do so" would not pass DFSG > muster. > > Discrimination against uses that are impossible, or don't make sense :). > > GPL Preamble: > > ... we have made it clear that any patent must be licensed for > > everyone's free use or not licensed at all. > > > -- Customer: "I'm running Windows '98" Tech: "Yes." Customer: "My computer isn't working now." Tech: "Yes, you said that." Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED], that's who!
