According to Tomasz Wegrzanowski:
> On Sat, Jun 17, 2000 at 10:20:23PM -0700, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
> > According to Joseph Carter:
> > > Okay guys, how about a few suggestions?
> >
> > Well, you could use the term "OSI-Certified Open Source" as an
> > unambiguous description of open source licenses. (Unless you don't
> > like OSI's certifications, of course.)
>
> Or DFSG-compatibile ?
Sure, if you like. But will Debian / SPI act against anyone who makes
false claims of DFSG compatibility? The term "OSI-Certified" is legal
property of OSI, and OSI will definitely protect it. That's why I made
the suggestion.
--
Chip Salzenberg - a.k.a. - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"I wanted to play hopscotch with the impenetrable mystery of existence,
but he stepped in a wormhole and had to go in early." // MST3K
