> The critical question, then, is: what remedy should Debian seek here? Indeed. I'd sum it up as "do we care that they reused our HTML code, and may or may not have broken a law by doing so."
Personally, it's mildly annoying, in the same way that it would be mildly annoying for a commercial Unix vendor to reuse without attribution a (unpatented but copyrighted) small utility function like a clever Makefile construct from a free software project. Not bad enough or legally clear enough to be worth pursuing, but kinda irksome. Remedy? They should give credit to Debian in the source, and make their source available. Oh, wait - they do that already. -- Mark Rafn [EMAIL PROTECTED] <http://www.dagon.net/> !G
