On Thu, May 25, 2000 at 02:35:30AM -0700, Joseph Carter wrote: > On Thu, May 25, 2000 at 01:59:10AM -0700, Ivan E. Moore II wrote: > > What is the current stance on programs that bind to qt 2.x which is using > > the QPL 2.0 license and are GPL'd or LGPL'd? > > Qt 2.0 with LGPL, no problem > Qt 2.0 with GPL, problem > > Same stance, has never changed. The GPL does not allow linking with Qt > 2.0. The people who write GPL apps using Qt 2.0 know this by now. KDE > knows it, that's for damned sure. Those authors who care have added the > necessary permissions. KDE hasn't and won't because then they'd have to > give up being able to use GPL'd code.
ok...unixODBC say's this: * All programs are GPL. * * All libs are LGPL so..based on what your saying, the libs could go into main, but the programs would be non-free...(or just not distributed)... and the source could go into main....since the interreaction of the gpl and qpl is in the .deb form...and not the source form. that sound logical? Ivan -- ---------------- Ivan E. Moore II [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://snowcrash.tdyc.com GPG KeyID=90BCE0DD GPG Fingerprint=F2FC 69FD 0DA0 4FB8 225E 27B6 7645 8141 90BC E0DD
