This would be my position: once you edit in the "debian" subdirectory, you are modifying the source tree. I don't see any way of satisfying the license other than by distributing source patches and letting the user build, as is done with Pine. This is annoying at best, and the Pine license is actually one of the principal motivations for Mutt.
There is almost certainly no way to get this into Potato now. -- Mike On 2000-05-22 at 18:54 -0500, Steve Greenland wrote: > I think there is also a body of opinion that the mere act of making a > debian package constitutes "distributing a modified version".
