On Mon, Apr 24, 2000 at 12:10:48AM -0600, John Galt wrote: > If they're incompatible, that logically means that one (or both) is > restricting SOMEBODY's freedom
True. If you read the GPL it will explain exactly which freedoms it restricts and why it does that. And if you examine the DFSG, or the FSF's definition of free software, you'll see that those freedom restrictions are allowed for a free software package. It is impossible to have total freedom. My freedom is restricted if I cannot restrict your freedom, and vice versa. > You're right--free != common, but then again, if it were common licenses, > I'm guessing that the Microsoft EULA should be listed How commonly is the Microsoft EULA used as a license in the Debian distribution? -- %%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%% I'm moving IRL on May 2, 2000. New contact information on the home page
