"Stephen C. North" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Yes, if "delivering custom-modified" software includes sharing source code > with customers, the AT&T Source Code Agreement further requires sharing > the patches with AT&T. If you keep the patches private my reading of the > AT&T license is that you can still redistribute binaries. I just realized > this > to my slight surprise and amusement. > > But doesn't the GPL also require the sharing of source code?
The GPL requires[1] that if you distribute a binary to someone, you must also distribute source to that person. It does not require you to distribute source or binaries to third parties. [1] In essence; it is possible to nitpick at this point.
