On Sun, Feb 20, 2000 at 09:35:20PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: [I don't expect it's reasonable for the GPL to] > > change in a fashion where modifications to a part of a program can't be > > distributed under the GPL. > > > > Nor do I expect it's reasonable to expect the GPL to change in a fashion > > which would allow Troll to re-release GPLed code under whatever license > > they choose. > > > > You'll note that your suggestion would have to be equivalent to one of > > these cases.
On Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 05:46:00AM +0200, Adi Stav wrote: > I don't see how... I didn't suggest allowing GPL code or its > modifications to be relicenses as any Free license, only that it can > linked to it. QPLed code can't be distributed under the GPL. Code which is linked into the program is part of the program. What part of that don't you understand? -- Raul
