> > > rationale : > > > 4. Our Priorities are Our Users and Free Software > > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I don't understand your point. On Tue, Nov 23, 1999 at 06:31:03PM +0100, Peter Makholm wrote: > Could the point be "Free software" as in FSF's free software > definition versus "Free software" as in Debian Free Software > Guidlines? Not really, not when you consider that you were responding to: > On Tue, Nov 23, 1999 at 09:51:06AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: > > [And, as an aside, I can see the advantage of building a > > free-software-developer oriented debian subset which consists of only > > software which can be combined with GPLed software -- without any > > restrictions beyond those allowed in the GPL.] Here, I was suggesting that there would be value >>to developers<< in having a debian subset which consisted of miscible software. As it happens, both FSF and Debian distribute software which can't be combined with GPLed software to form a program. -- Raul
