Gavriel State <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Regardless of whether or not the dynamic linkage is a violation, the header
> file used has (almost) nothing to do with it.
Nevertheless the inclusion of header files *is* the key point of an
often-heard argument that the dynamic linkage is a violation.
> A legal argument can be made that the relevant portions of header content
> are not protectable by copyright since they are essentially a 'compilation
> of facts'
I agree with that, but obviously not everybody else do.
--
Henning Makholm "You propose to avoid dying? I will be
interested to hear the method you plan for this endeavour."
