On Sun, Sep 05, 1999 at 07:44:49PM -0700, Joseph Carter wrote: > It's all bad to wrose. I'm pretty sure iD would be happy to fix the > license if we show them there's more than a couple people who still care, > enough to make it worth the effort.
Well, I mailed John Carmack already, and you say you will, so that's a couple, at least. I alerted him to the fact that id's license makes what's going on currently illegal. > > What I'm wondering about is how that will work. id can't change licenses > > retro-actively - however, in lxdoom, it's referenced as follows: > > Change, no. Offer under different terms additionally, sure they can. > They own full Copyright after all. I just checked lxdoom's src directory. The only file that isn't (C) id is l_musserver.c, which is GPL. I don't think it's linked into the lxdoom binary, though - it is for the music server, and as far as I can see it's not referenced in the makefile.
