Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I doubt it will be GPL compatible even if this is cleared up. > > As I read the GPL (section 2, b) it requires that the *entire source* > for binaries you distibute must itself be distributed under GPL; so > the license will only be GPL compatible if it allows the source code > to be redistributed under GPL. > > The clause that is discussed above only applies to binary > redistributions of IBM's software.
Given that we're talking about a hypothetical license which removes the restrictions imposed by that clause, I fail to see the conflict. The IBM license allows for distribution of modified sources, for example. -- Raul
