Raul writes: > It ["relicensing"] doesn't mean much if you don't put original content > into your derived copy, but there's nothing that prevents multiple > licenses.
It doen't mean anything. The original work retains its original license while whatever you added to create the derivative gets whatever license you choose to apply to it. Nothing gets relicensed. > There's plenty of examples where a public domain work was relicensed and > sold for a lot of money. And those who paid that money can extract the PD work and distribute copies with impunity no matter how the seller "relicensed" it. I can copy Hume's words out of my copy of _Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion_ and start selling copies and there is nothing Thomas Nelson and Sons, Ltd. can do about it. Hume's words remain in the public domain no matter what the title page says. -- John Hasler This posting is in the public domain. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Do with it what you will. Dancing Horse Hill Make money from it if you can; I don't mind. Elmwood, Wisconsin Do not send email advertisements to this address.
