Jonathan P Tomer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > They would also distribute > > some proprietary object files which just happened to be able to > > link together with the GPL'ed source code. FSF can't prevent that.
> the trick: it doesn't just happen to link with the gpl code, it requires it > and is thus related enough to be a modification. or something like > that. Would that mean that a program that happens to run only under Linux 2.2.x is a modification of Linux and so MUST be GPL'ed? -- Henning Makholm
